appear to support the view held by all who have investigated the question on the spot, that
there is no reason to apprehend that the construction of such breakwater would be likely to endanger the harbour by causing a deposit of silt; this however be further tested by the construction of a small part of the proposed breakwater as an experiment. It would probably be necessary in the first instance to make trial borings in order to ascertain the depth to which stones would be likely to sink; if the result of the borings should show that the cost of a continuous breakwater would be prohibitive, a fairly effective obstacle might still be formed by placing at intervals masses of stone, disposed in two or three lines so that the masses in one line would cover the intervals in another.
I have,
Jo D. H. Barker Lieut.
Act. Asst. Military Secretary
Page 349
appear to support the view held by all who have investigated the question on the spot, that
Lo
a
there is no reason
apprehend that the construction of euch breakwater would be likely to insure the harbour by causing
right
a
deposit of silt; this however be further tried by the
constructiev
CL
small part
of the protood breakwater as
ait-
expercinent. It would
probably be necessary
in the first
instance to make trial borings.
in order to
ascertain the depth
to which stones would be likely to sucks; if the revult of the se berings should shew that the
cost of
A
continuous breakwater
would be prohibitive, a fairly effective obstacle might still be formed by placing at intervalo
of stone, disposed in two
of three lines so that the masses
cre
349
one live would cover the
intervals in
another.
I have.
Jo D. H. Barker Lieut. 400.
Act. Aest. Military Secretary
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.